![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

58°
Cloudy | 8MPH
NEWSROOM * CIRCULATION * ADVERTISING
Thursday
September 2010
9

I am an Ultra-Conservative, Alpha-Male, True Authentic Leader, Type "C" Personality, who is very active in my community; whether it is donating time, clothes or money for Project Concern or going to Common Council meetings and voicing my opinions. As a blogger, I intend to provide a different viewpoint "The way I see it!" on various world, national and local issues with a few helpful tips & tidbits sprinkled in.
Published:
By Sean Ryan
The city has two potential sites — the 31-acre Iceport property near downtown and a contaminated site on the northern edge of
Fritts and the majority of
“When you lay it all out,” Fritts said, “if you put a big-box retailer on the (Iceport) site, you really lose the ability to maximize the value of the site.”
Scott Yauck, partner in Cobalt Partners, said he plans to develop a big-box retail store on his
But two members of the Community Development Authority argue a big box at the Cobalt site, which is farther from downtown
“At least with the Iceport property,” he said, “you are dragging them at least a little bit into
Alderman Joseph Mikolajczak said he shares
Mikolajczak said his constituents prefer the Iceport property because it is within walking distance of city neighborhoods.
“It’s interesting now that the conversation has switched to: Where do we want to put it; not whether we can have it,” he said.
Fritts said that, based on the assessed values big-box stores have generated in other communities, project such as Continental’s would have roughly $18 million in property value. But the city is negotiating to bring a 300,000-square-foot industrial plant to the Iceport property, she said, that would generate $25 million in new value.
She said ongoing negotiations also prevent the city from disclosing the name of the potential industrial company.
Continental in 2007 proposed building a Walmart on the Iceport property, but the Cudahy Plan Commission rejected the project after residents opposed having a Walmart in town,
Fritts said next week she will negotiate with Cobalt and brokers for potential big-box tenants at the annual meeting of the International Council of Shopping Centers. She said
Source: Daily Reporter
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
|
|||||||||||
6 Comments
JTozz - Jul 29, 2010 6:58 AM
Randy Hollenbeck - Jul 29, 2010 8:09 AM
I think originally the industrial place that needed the train spur was Bucyrus. I think they were playing Cudahy against South Milwaukee to have South Milwaukee sweeten the deal and cement it in South Milwaukee.
I just wonder how much more vapor development will be promised all the while Wal-Mart was real moves to Oak Creek.
Cudahy One - Jul 29, 2010 9:52 AM
The Penn and Layton site makes perfect sense for major retail, because with 794 and major north south route, any major or even minor retailer would pick this site over the former ice port site. Think about it this way, would you rather build on Port Washington and Silver Spring (like Bayshore), or would you rather be on Port Washington and Tweety Bird Lane (made up street but located 8 blocks east of Port Washington). Now, you would take PW and SS.
Their may come a point where the city has to realize that it has too much open land, and not enough developers coming to the table. That is called Reality.
Several months ago we were told that they cannot concentrate on this site because of Sara Development working on Layton and Squire AVenue area. However, it makes most sense to concentrate on Penn site, rather than there, because SOMEONE WANTS TO COME!
Continential and Cobalt are companies with a good reputation, we should jump on this, before they run to Oak Creek or Franklin.
JTozz - Jul 29, 2010 12:39 PM
On the same point, I dont think a retailer would have a second look at the Iceport area with its over run weeds and mini-hills. Looks more like a dump than the other location.
Randy Hollenbeck - Jul 29, 2010 5:38 PM
I still keep in contact with Wal-Mart and Continental and I know they would like to sit down with Cudahy and work something out. Wal-Mart doesn’t want the Penn site. Over and over they state that.
I know Lara would like to force Wal-Mart on to the Penn site, but they don’t want it. They want to be on the Meyer site. I too would like a water park/hotel that would be open year round. Talking about the bike race and how all those bikers stayed at hotels not in Cudahy!
I think it is time to just let Lara go, she promises the moon about the Meyer site, but that is only to keep Wal-Mart out!
Cudahy1st - Jul 29, 2010 7:23 PM